I have been thinking about that, yeah. Details after the cut.
From the beginning, the storyline of there being an all-woman boat was compelling for me. I realize that was intentional on the part of the sponsor and the central VOR media operation, but I don’t begrudge them that. They’re in the business of trying to get people interested in the race, and the all-woman team has a built-in storyline that is going to interest a lot of people, including people who haven’t previously paid much attention to competitive offshore sailing.
There are no other women competing this time around. There have been 4 previous races (out of the 11 Volvo/Whitbread races that preceded this one) in which there was an all-woman crew, but this is the first time since the 2001-2002 race, and arguably the first time ever that a woman’s team has competed on an equal footing in terms of the quality of the boat and the resources of the shore operation.
The one accommodation to gender in the VOR rules is that any team composed entirely of women can have 11 crew onboard (plus the 1 OBR who doesn’t sail the boat), as opposed to the 8 + 1 limit for the other boats. Racing a VOR 65 is very dependent on upper-body strength for things like hoisting and sheeting in sails and shifting “the stack” (the unused sails and other gear that they are constantly moving around the boat for optimal weight placement). The consensus seems to be that having the 3 extra crew doesn’t get SCA all the way to parity, especially for the shorter in-port races where completing maneuvers quickly is crucial. But it helps.
Where they might make up for that somewhat is with their on-board crew dynamic.
I grew up racing on sailboats (because my father raced, and dragged his kids along with him). This was mostly amateur racing in southern California, with the longest races only lasting a few days. So it was a very different sort of thing than the VOR. Still, it gives me a (possibly misguided) sense that I can relate to the on-board dynamics you see in the videos.
A racing sailboat is an intense environment. You’re cooped up in a tiny space with a group of people for an extended time. You’re dealing with cold, heat, discomfort, motion sickness, sleep deprivation, mental and physical stress, and the added stress of competition. Sometimes it can be frightening, even physically dangerous. Other times it can be boring. And you’re trapped. Whatever you’re experiencing, there’s no escape.
Everything ends up being magnified. If there’s a positive energy, it can be wonderful. If there’s a negative energy, it can be horrible. Having women in the crew, in my limited experience, can help make the energy more positive.
I don’t want to take it too far, because every crew and individual is different. But I’ve raced with both male-female and all-male crews, and it’s my sense that there’s a particular kind of emotional intelligence that tends to be present when the crew includes women. It’s a (potentially sexist) cliché, but I think having women on board can have a civilizing effect. At least, in the absence of women I think there is a greater risk of a certain kind of macho dynamic taking over.
I feel like I can see some of that in the various VOR teams. At one extreme is SCA, which under Sam Davies’ leadership has demonstrated a nurturing, cohesive crew dynamic. Even when things are going badly (and things certainly went badly for them at various points during Leg 1), there’s a sense of the team looking out for each other and pulling together.
The other crews all show their own versions of that kind of team dynamic, but there are differences. Not all those differences are gender-based; there are other factors at work like age and national origin/culture. And again: individual differences. The skippers and watch captains, especially, put their personal stamps on the way things run.
If you watched video of the finish today, you saw a very different kind of on-board dynamic on Mapfre than on SCA. I don’t think it was just the difference between a leader seeing their lead erode and a follower seeing a chance to pass. Mapfre in particular has been generating a lot of talk among sailing obsessives because despite having one of the most-successful and experienced crews in the fleet, they haven’t seemed to gel as a team, with the result that the on-board decision-making and performance seem to have suffered.
And then you have Dongfeng, where a small number of experienced people along with a group of very inexperienced people seem to have come together really well, such that they’ve outperformed some observers’ expectations.
But getting back to gender, there’s a particular kind of unpleasant male-specific gender dynamic that I mostly haven’t seen on the VOR boats. Where I have come across it is in the discussion forums at Sailing Anarchy, a popular site for online sailing discussion. I won’t say it’s commonplace there, but that it even happens at all kind of shocks me. I’m talking about the kind of overtly misogynist online sexism that I’m sure I don’t have to describe to anyone who’s both 1) active online and 2) a woman. But I’ve been spending so much of my time on Tumblr in fandoms that skew toward women that I guess I’d forgotten how bad it can be.
The closest thing I’ve seen to that sort of attitude on the VOR boats have been a few moments in videos from Alvimedica. I don’t want to make too much of those moments. But I’ve thought about them.
One moment was from early in Leg 1, when Alvimedica watch captain Mark Towill had his 26th birthday on board, and the team posted video of him receiving a present of a couple of Playboy and Penthouse magazines. It wasn’t the fact that it happened that bothered me, but more that the Alvimedica shore operation thought it would be a cool video to add some music to and post on the team’s YouTube channel. That made me think, wow; this media operation is being run by dudes, and more, by dudes who aren’t concerned at all about potentially alienating some of the women in their audience.
The later moment was just a brief comment in a video from day 21, when Mark jokingly told skipper Charlie Enright, who was answering a question from the OBR, “He’s talking about the weather, you douche.” And granted, they were slatting in zero wind, had just lost a bunch of distance to the boats around them, and it was just playful dudebro joshing of the sort that is completely unremarkable in a context of a bunch of young American males hanging out together and blowing off steam by humorously putting each other down. But to my Tumblr-sensitized ears it came off as a gendered slur.
Alvimedica has the youngest and most American crew in the VOR. As someone who came from the same cultural context and has only recently had his own consciousness raised somewhat, I’m probably more sensitive to this kind of casual sexism than I otherwise would be. I’m not saying the sailors on Alvimedica are bad people. But to my eye they exhibit signs of some problematic and unexamined views about women that are extremely common among young male Americans.
The crew of SCA face a lot of hardships. Besides fighting against the same storms and doldrums and monster waves and unappetizing food and broken heads and physical drudgery as the rest of the teams, they’re also fighting a battle for acceptance. Just by being there, by taking on the challenges of the race and facing them as women, they’re sending an important message.
I think that’s pretty cool, and potentially a more significant accomplishment than crossing oceans or winning races.
Reposted from http://ift.tt/1quoLPQ.
