edwardspoonhands: theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguz…

edwardspoonhands:

theashleyclements:

wilwheaton:

jenniferdeguzman:

He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise.

mechcanuck:

I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW 

The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies.

Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that.

This just… hurts. 

This reminds me of all the executives being hired to run YouTube networks who probably couldn’t name more than one YouTube channel. 

Reblogging for Jon’s response.

Reposted from http://lies.tumblr.com/post/50541153486.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.