Iraqi Footage of Captured US Soldiers Censored?

I can’t help wondering about the rationale being offered for keeping the Al Jazeera footage of the captured U.S. soldiers off the air in this country. Apparently the effort to keep us from seeing these images goes further than that, too; at Yellow Times they are running the following notice: “The pictures of U.S. POWs and Iraqi civilian casualties has been censored by our hosting provider. Therefore, we cannot show these pictures. They also forced us to remove pictures of Iraqi casualties. Our site was shut down for an hour until we removed the pictures. You can see the pictures at our affiliate site here: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0303/S00212.htm.”

Over at ArabNews, they have a page of stills from the Al Jazeera footage titled Pictures US Media will not show; elsewhere, they use a still from the video in a news story titled Day of Setbacks for US.

All of this raises several questions in my mind. Why are the images not being shown? I could see commercial news outlets shying away from doing so on the grounds that the images would be too disturbing for an American audience, and they wouldn’t want to hurt their ratings (though you could argue that their duty as a news organization should trump such concerns, given the issues involved), but that wouldn’t explain Yellow Times’ Internet provider (VORTECHHOSTING.COM, orlando, fl) shutting their site down until the pictures had been removed. Maybe that could be justified as a standard response to posting others’ copyrighted material in violation of an Acceptable Use Policy, but I’d still wonder about whether the ISP was acting on complaints it had received, or what. (Update: See the comments, below, for a copy of the email their tech support folks sent in response to my asking them about it.) You could argue that these images should not be shown out of respect for the POWs (and dead soliders’) families, but you’d have to balance that against the interest of a democratic society in having an accurate picture of the costs of the war, such that informed decisions could be made about it.

Anyway, a lot of those questions are effectively moot, at least for the subset of the population getting its information from the net, given its dumb-in-the-middle design, which makes it pretty darn hard to keep people from seeing things you don’t want them to see. But I can see where this could definitely raise some hackles on the part of those who view ready access to such information as being very much a bug, rather than a feature.

Some of these issues are summed up quite nicely by an editorial at ArabNews.com: Lies, Lies, and More Lies (catchy title, that), which points the finger at Donald Rumsfeld, claiming he has bullied CNN, Fox, and MSNBC into keeping the images off the air because they are “propaganda” in violation of the Geneva Convention. Deep, murky waters we’re swimming in here. When those news outlets quote Iraqi government officials saying the infidels are being driven back by the heroic resistance, that’s obviously propaganda, too, but Rumsfeld apparently doesn’t feel like he needs to take personal steps to keep it off the air; he assumes that a reasonably intelligent audience will compare that information to the other information they have available, and conclude that the Iraqi officials are blowing smoke. But the footage of US POWs is different, because, well, it’s true, and it’s much more damaging to the Bush administration’s effort to keep public support for the war as high as possible.

So I can certainly see why Rumsfeld would want to keep us from seeing it. But that doesn’t mean he’s right. And in the context of ready access to non-US information sources, he loses. At least for now, and at least for those of us whose media are new enough to actually work the way information sources are supposed to in an open, democratic society.

2 Responses to “Iraqi Footage of Captured US Soldiers Censored?”

  1. a_stupid_box Says:

    I’d just like to ask those who insist that the U.S. is an untainted, limitless source of freedom what they think of this. After all, freedom of the press is a RIGHT we have, isn’t it?

    Oh, wait, my bad… that’s like all of our other “rights”… no longer guaranteed.

    Now what I’m writing next is going to be vague, but it has to be. I’ve no links to support it, so figure me as a liar if you wish. Makes no difference to me, but if I stop posting here for some long damned amount of time you’ll be able to guess why.

    I knew of this incident before I read it here and am actually quite surprised to find it on lies.com. In some of the more… informed/shady/fringe of legal… circles I hang out in this is BIG news, and it’s commonly accepted that this was much more than just an ISP flexing their muscle.

    This bad boy supposedly goes much higher up the food chain to one of those abbreviated departments throwing their weight around. But, that’s all I’m saying, and I’m looking over my shoulders because of it. Some of you net.vets might want to check out USEnet, mIRC, or even hop around a few telnet chats…

  2. John Callender Says:

    From: support@hsphere.cc

    Date: Mon Mar 24, 2003 10:18:18 AM US/Pacific

    To: John Callender

    Subject: Reply: Yellow Times AUP violation? #46785

    ======== CUT HERE =========

    Your support request was answered:

    Created: Mar 24, 2003 4:31:19 AM

    Last Mod: Mar 24, 2003 1:15:10 PM

    Assigned To: Kim(Verification)

    [Mar 24, 2003 1:18:18 PM]

    A: There were complaints made directly to our upstream provider. Also, the posting of graphic violence or death is a violation of our AUP.

    You can review our policied at http://vortechhosting.com/aup/

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.