That noted ‘denier’ or ‘skeptic’ (just choose whichever term floats yer boat) Rich Muller has concluded the data is accurate and mankind appears to be driving most of the climate change is a pretty big story. I know someone who has had lunch with Rich a few times, and I’ve met him personally (he gave a energy lecture at the local high school). Mr Muller appears to be convinced by the science, by the actual data, but you’ve got your taxamagical filbbertygibbit to cling to… and as you’ve stated before ‘you will never be convinced by the science’ (I’m paraphrasing, but here is the actual quote http://www.lies.com/wp/2012/04/11/15000-warm-temperature-records-broken-in-march-2012/#comment-316879 )

If BEST had ‘discovered’ that the data was all bunkum, you know you would be trumpeting this left right and center… and we’d probably be saying that the analysis was tainted by oil money… that the opposite has happened, that the data points to ACC being a real phenomena must be a real head-popper for you wwnjs.

Now can we stop arguing about if it is real or not (it’s real) now can we start doing something? Cheap, smart, fast, but most of all NOW.

If this were a commie asteroid hurtling towards Earth, painted red with big hammers and sickles all over it, you wwnjs would be demanding action. But since it might shave a penny off the oil/coal profits, you just bleat whatever Rush regurgitates and fox amplifies. Again. Hey btw did you hear that over here in Reality, there were NO Iraqi WMDs? True. (listens for wwnj head popping sounds)

I’ve always been amused by people that are shocked when their spouse is caught sleeping with someone else, but then have a rebound affair with someone that is still married and are just as shocked when that second mate is caught cheating a few years later. It takes two to bribe, the briber and the bribie. So you are critical for Kochs bribing Mueller (without evidence) (to complete the loop he would have had to accept the bribe) but there is absolutely no way he is being bribed now. Odd logic.

That is the point. Shcb comment is attempt to obfuscate and is example of his predilection for misdirection to lead to mostly irrelevant conclusions aka “slam dunks into gatoraid barrel”. Hence, I LOLZ.

Have you seen reports of the Koch brother’s new study on AGW / Climate change? Read the bbc summary, but here’s another: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-muller-climate-20120730,0,3167677.story

The evidence supporting knarly’s law keeps growing, .. shcb speaks, ergo it’s false.