Interesting post, worth rumination.

Remember that the major problem with 911 is that mathematics and basic physics belie simple damage & fire induced collapses.

If there is a prosopagnosia or “face blindness” then it is by those who fail to acknowledge that conservation of momentum and other basic Newtonian laws are absent from WTC 1, 2 & 7 and fail to recognize that all the 13 pieces of the “face” that is a controlled demolition are present in these collapses. (Face blindness is not apparent in the 911 truthers who acknowledge that planes, fires and collapses were prominent features but that there were also a whole collection of other features visible making up the whole of the faces of the explosive collapses.)

Likewise, the Capgras Delusion does not fit 911 truthers because they emphatically do not say that the collapses look like mom (i.e. a simple damage & fire collapse) and that it feels like it must be something else more sinister. Quite the contrary. They clearly point out how the WTC 1, 2 & 7 explosive collapses look nothing like Mom but look much like Uncle Albert the fat, bald construction worker with a glowing red cigar butt sticking out of his face, but that emotionally they do feel like simple hijackings gone amock.

If there is an emotional response that fits JBC’s Capgras Delusion theory, the best fit is that it is those who believe the official story. They see the explosive collapse but just don’t believe it is their Uncle Albert because of the emotional cost of admitting to themselves that he would pre-meditatively obtain and plant such explosives and do something so evil to his own family, ergo it must be an Arab imposter using simple airplanes instead.