<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carey: On Magical Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/</link>
	<description>believe nothing...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42796</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42796</guid>
		<description>I read this about the use of the word "Democrat":

"The word "Democrat" is a noun; its use as an adjective defies the rules of English grammar."

Which shouldn't be to surprising coming from this dickhead of a president who butchers the english language on pretty much a daily basis. I agree, what a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this about the use of the word &#8220;Democrat&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;The word &#8220;Democrat&#8221; is a noun; its use as an adjective defies the rules of English grammar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which shouldn&#8217;t be to surprising coming from this dickhead of a president who butchers the english language on pretty much a daily basis. I agree, what a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethan-p</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42592</link>
		<dc:creator>ethan-p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42592</guid>
		<description>I like how religious faith was carefully taken out of the equation.  I don't want to incite anyone with my not-so-nice opinions...actually, it's just the people here who are my personal friends who I don't want to incite.  The rest of y'all can eat me ;).  However, I think that if anyone wanted to analyze this in an objective way, religious beliefs must be heaped in with superstitious behavior.  This is especially given the huge leaps of faith which must be taken in order to get beyond the seemingly titanic logical fallacies inherent to most organized religions.  Ultimately, these widespread superstitions are to the same end of individual superstition.  The 'end user' is provided some form of comfort by the ritual regardless of the actual effect.  The only difference is that most of the superstitious behavior mentioned in the article is unique to the individual rather than the massive scale of the superstitions behind organized religion.

What's interesting is that while some religious superstition is discussed here, such as the effectiveness of praying for a loved one or team.  I'm surprised that the article doesn't discuss team prayer and thanking God for their victory (and never damning God for their loss).

Then again, I can't say that I'm &lt;i&gt;above&lt;/i&gt; this kind of thinking.  I still lay my palm on the exterior fuselage of an aircraft prior to boarding.  I guess laying my hand on a solid piece of aluminum restores my confidence in the structural integrity of the craft.  I don't know if it's a magical belief , but there's definitely some superstition at play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how religious faith was carefully taken out of the equation.  I don&#8217;t want to incite anyone with my not-so-nice opinions&#8230;actually, it&#8217;s just the people here who are my personal friends who I don&#8217;t want to incite.  The rest of y&#8217;all can eat me ;).  However, I think that if anyone wanted to analyze this in an objective way, religious beliefs must be heaped in with superstitious behavior.  This is especially given the huge leaps of faith which must be taken in order to get beyond the seemingly titanic logical fallacies inherent to most organized religions.  Ultimately, these widespread superstitions are to the same end of individual superstition.  The &#8216;end user&#8217; is provided some form of comfort by the ritual regardless of the actual effect.  The only difference is that most of the superstitious behavior mentioned in the article is unique to the individual rather than the massive scale of the superstitions behind organized religion.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that while some religious superstition is discussed here, such as the effectiveness of praying for a loved one or team.  I&#8217;m surprised that the article doesn&#8217;t discuss team prayer and thanking God for their victory (and never damning God for their loss).</p>
<p>Then again, I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m <i>above</i> this kind of thinking.  I still lay my palm on the exterior fuselage of an aircraft prior to boarding.  I guess laying my hand on a solid piece of aluminum restores my confidence in the structural integrity of the craft.  I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a magical belief , but there&#8217;s definitely some superstition at play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbc</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42538</link>
		<dc:creator>jbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42538</guid>
		<description>Yup. I had the exact same reaction to that as I was listening to the speech on my way home from work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. I had the exact same reaction to that as I was listening to the speech on my way home from work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam_blust</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42537</link>
		<dc:creator>adam_blust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2007/01/24/carey-on-magical-thinking/#comment-42537</guid>
		<description>One thing that struck me (and others) was how Bush welcomed Nancy Pelosi as the first female Speaker, and then followed it up immediately with the phrase "Democrat majority." What a tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that struck me (and others) was how Bush welcomed Nancy Pelosi as the first female Speaker, and then followed it up immediately with the phrase &#8220;Democrat majority.&#8221; What a tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
