<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Lie on Rumsfeld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/</link>
	<description>believe nothing...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41939</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41939</guid>
		<description>Independent Inky-doo returns, with the usual incoherent rambling!  Aw, is him still injured?  Who is Osama bin Hussein?

Poor Obama.  Reared as a Muslim, now trying to hide in a Protestant church for obvious reasons of hopeful political gain.  I can hardly wait to see sHrillary tear him apart in the primaries.  His Muslim &quot;past,&quot; his admitted drug use, etc.  It should be quite a party.

Perhaps you would force my pharmacist, and thousands of other small business owners, to retain all of his employees at the new wage rate?  Sorry, but it won&#039;t happen.

I take no medications, I don&#039;t do drugs, and haven&#039;t even had a beer since my daughter was born 28 years ago.  Also, I&#039;m a high school teacher, not a college prof, so politics don&#039;t enter my classroom.  If you and your little buddy must rely on straw-man arguments to impress your little office girls, knock yourself out.

About two-thirds of the way through January, with 24 casualties so far - some of them non-combat related.  The December stats were encouraging for you, but January has long-since arrived.

I shouldn&#039;t resist the new, second-guessing Commanders-in-Chief leaders of Congress who don&#039;t know what they want from one day to the next?  After all the lectures about how dissent is the only true form of patriotism, &lt;i&gt;I&#039;m just trying to follow your rules&lt;/i&gt;.

Reid, Pulloutsy, and the rest of their bunch demanded troop increases.  Less than a month later, they don&#039;t want troop increases.  Did they learn the flip-flop technique from Big John?  It certainly worked well for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent Inky-doo returns, with the usual incoherent rambling!  Aw, is him still injured?  Who is Osama bin Hussein?</p>
<p>Poor Obama.  Reared as a Muslim, now trying to hide in a Protestant church for obvious reasons of hopeful political gain.  I can hardly wait to see sHrillary tear him apart in the primaries.  His Muslim &#8220;past,&#8221; his admitted drug use, etc.  It should be quite a party.</p>
<p>Perhaps you would force my pharmacist, and thousands of other small business owners, to retain all of his employees at the new wage rate?  Sorry, but it won&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>I take no medications, I don&#8217;t do drugs, and haven&#8217;t even had a beer since my daughter was born 28 years ago.  Also, I&#8217;m a high school teacher, not a college prof, so politics don&#8217;t enter my classroom.  If you and your little buddy must rely on straw-man arguments to impress your little office girls, knock yourself out.</p>
<p>About two-thirds of the way through January, with 24 casualties so far &#8211; some of them non-combat related.  The December stats were encouraging for you, but January has long-since arrived.</p>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t resist the new, second-guessing Commanders-in-Chief leaders of Congress who don&#8217;t know what they want from one day to the next?  After all the lectures about how dissent is the only true form of patriotism, <i>I&#8217;m just trying to follow your rules</i>.</p>
<p>Reid, Pulloutsy, and the rest of their bunch demanded troop increases.  Less than a month later, they don&#8217;t want troop increases.  Did they learn the flip-flop technique from Big John?  It certainly worked well for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enkidu</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41894</link>
		<dc:creator>enkidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41894</guid>
		<description>Breathtakingly angry and illogical, but that&#039;s your schtick Macaca-san.

I mentioned your wonderful respect and civility with regard to the new leadership of Congress simply because you so love to lecture others on the decorum and manners which you so lack.  It&#039;s the internets, go fuck yourself m&#039;lord.  Since Dickhead Cheney can yell &quot;go fuck yourself&quot; to Patrick Leahy on the Senate floor, it must be proper for a blog&#039;s comment area.  Leahy seems intent on uncovering the truth regarding the abuse of power, privilege and our tax dollars.  Subpoena power activate!

A supermajority of American&#039;s (the ones who value patriotism above rock stupid partisanship) think the bush/mccain &#039;doctrine&#039; of a way-too-weak-escalation is a Very Bad Idea (see Tom Tomorrow&#039;s hilarious toons asap).  You claim that US casualties are down (they aren&#039;t, see the lies.com vietnam/iraq casualty post), while also impunging anyone to the left of your rightwingjingofascism.  I would love the casualty count to go to zero, but your sick fantasies and hatred of anyone to the left seem to know no bounds.  Then again, any time you aren&#039;t shoving your craziness down the throats of children is time well spent.

You spend a lot of time with your dealer (or is that druggist?)  So you and this other rightwing nutjob think raising the minimum wage 12% a year for 3 years is far too burdensome?  You claim the kids mostly just stand around and do nothing, what kind of work ethic is that?  He could afford the minimum raise if he made the kids actually work (perhaps improving customer satisfaction, simple cleaning, bringing in new business or improving the performance of the existing processes by a whopping 12%?)  As a small business owner, I don&#039;t hire people to sit on their hands for charity.  Sorry to be so capitalistic, but if your dealer (ooops druggist) is hiring these kids as a charity, he seems woefully cheap to not pony up the 12% increase after no increases for a decade.  Maybe he should just cut your antipsychotics a bit more (meth is a horrible scourge and I hope and pray for your recovery).  Speaking of meds, perhaps your druggist should tell you to take those antipsychotics in parallel rather than a serial fashion.  One a day would explain your anger management issues and general incoherence/demeanor: you need to take the antidepressants WITH the antipsychotics (and the other stuff) SEVERAL times a day.  And lay off the meth.

Speaking of meth, your hilarious smears about Barak Obama reach new heights of hypocrisy.  You call him a muslim, a meth user and enjoy pointing out that he has the same middle name as Osama bin Hussien (wasn&#039;t he that tin-pot dictator we propped up in the 80s? hung by a mob in vietraq?)  Equally bizarre are your smears of anyone who dares use the term neo-con (I hadn&#039;t heard the rightwingnutjob spin machine&#039;s new talking point that neo-con = anti-semite...  hilarious!)

Keep it up superrightwingnutjobman and I&#039;ll register as a Demoncrat!   ooooooooo!   scary!  but hilarious!

boo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breathtakingly angry and illogical, but that&#8217;s your schtick Macaca-san.</p>
<p>I mentioned your wonderful respect and civility with regard to the new leadership of Congress simply because you so love to lecture others on the decorum and manners which you so lack.  It&#8217;s the internets, go fuck yourself m&#8217;lord.  Since Dickhead Cheney can yell &#8220;go fuck yourself&#8221; to Patrick Leahy on the Senate floor, it must be proper for a blog&#8217;s comment area.  Leahy seems intent on uncovering the truth regarding the abuse of power, privilege and our tax dollars.  Subpoena power activate!</p>
<p>A supermajority of American&#8217;s (the ones who value patriotism above rock stupid partisanship) think the bush/mccain &#8216;doctrine&#8217; of a way-too-weak-escalation is a Very Bad Idea (see Tom Tomorrow&#8217;s hilarious toons asap).  You claim that US casualties are down (they aren&#8217;t, see the lies.com vietnam/iraq casualty post), while also impunging anyone to the left of your rightwingjingofascism.  I would love the casualty count to go to zero, but your sick fantasies and hatred of anyone to the left seem to know no bounds.  Then again, any time you aren&#8217;t shoving your craziness down the throats of children is time well spent.</p>
<p>You spend a lot of time with your dealer (or is that druggist?)  So you and this other rightwing nutjob think raising the minimum wage 12% a year for 3 years is far too burdensome?  You claim the kids mostly just stand around and do nothing, what kind of work ethic is that?  He could afford the minimum raise if he made the kids actually work (perhaps improving customer satisfaction, simple cleaning, bringing in new business or improving the performance of the existing processes by a whopping 12%?)  As a small business owner, I don&#8217;t hire people to sit on their hands for charity.  Sorry to be so capitalistic, but if your dealer (ooops druggist) is hiring these kids as a charity, he seems woefully cheap to not pony up the 12% increase after no increases for a decade.  Maybe he should just cut your antipsychotics a bit more (meth is a horrible scourge and I hope and pray for your recovery).  Speaking of meds, perhaps your druggist should tell you to take those antipsychotics in parallel rather than a serial fashion.  One a day would explain your anger management issues and general incoherence/demeanor: you need to take the antidepressants WITH the antipsychotics (and the other stuff) SEVERAL times a day.  And lay off the meth.</p>
<p>Speaking of meth, your hilarious smears about Barak Obama reach new heights of hypocrisy.  You call him a muslim, a meth user and enjoy pointing out that he has the same middle name as Osama bin Hussien (wasn&#8217;t he that tin-pot dictator we propped up in the 80s? hung by a mob in vietraq?)  Equally bizarre are your smears of anyone who dares use the term neo-con (I hadn&#8217;t heard the rightwingnutjob spin machine&#8217;s new talking point that neo-con = anti-semite&#8230;  hilarious!)</p>
<p>Keep it up superrightwingnutjobman and I&#8217;ll register as a Demoncrat!   ooooooooo!   scary!  but hilarious!</p>
<p>boo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41634</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41634</guid>
		<description>btw, since you ignored the Barack Hussein Obama reference, I assure you that skin tone is not a political concern for me.  I would vote for Starr Parker or J. C. Watts without hesitation.

Predictably, anyone who opposes the Illinois Muslim will be accused of racism.  That&#039;s pretty sad... and simple-minded... ignorant...and sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, since you ignored the Barack Hussein Obama reference, I assure you that skin tone is not a political concern for me.  I would vote for Starr Parker or J. C. Watts without hesitation.</p>
<p>Predictably, anyone who opposes the Illinois Muslim will be accused of racism.  That&#8217;s pretty sad&#8230; and simple-minded&#8230; ignorant&#8230;and sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41632</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41632</guid>
		<description>When you have to resort to such goofy rhetoric, you expose your lack of fact-based argument, so thanks for the concession.

Be cautious with the &quot;my bad&quot; expressions, lest you be ridiculed by your alter-ego, Independent Inky-doo.

I make no assumption that all people who oppose the Iraq war are anti-war... because &lt;b&gt;there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; no anti-war movement&lt;/b&gt;.  Rather, it is simply an &lt;i&gt;anti-Bush&lt;/i&gt; movement by people who would sacrifice &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;anything&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;everything&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; for political gain.

I visited the pharmacy to pick up my wife&#039;s meds.  She&#039;s fighting breast cancer - if that&#039;s somehow relevant or of importance to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you have to resort to such goofy rhetoric, you expose your lack of fact-based argument, so thanks for the concession.</p>
<p>Be cautious with the &#8220;my bad&#8221; expressions, lest you be ridiculed by your alter-ego, Independent Inky-doo.</p>
<p>I make no assumption that all people who oppose the Iraq war are anti-war&#8230; because <b>there <i>is</i> no anti-war movement</b>.  Rather, it is simply an <i>anti-Bush</i> movement by people who would sacrifice <i><b>anything</b></i> and <i><b>everything</b></i> for political gain.</p>
<p>I visited the pharmacy to pick up my wife&#8217;s meds.  She&#8217;s fighting breast cancer &#8211; if that&#8217;s somehow relevant or of importance to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41620</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41620</guid>
		<description>While the U.S. Congress raised its pay eight times over the past decade, it refused to raise the minimum wage above the current $5.15-an-hour level since 1997. During that time nearly three-fifths of our states acted on behalf of working men and women at the lowest wage scales. Ten of those states even tied future increases in the minimum wage to inflation, exhibiting both foresight and a commitment to working Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the U.S. Congress raised its pay eight times over the past decade, it refused to raise the minimum wage above the current $5.15-an-hour level since 1997. During that time nearly three-fifths of our states acted on behalf of working men and women at the lowest wage scales. Ten of those states even tied future increases in the minimum wage to inflation, exhibiting both foresight and a commitment to working Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41605</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41605</guid>
		<description>Oh I&#039;m sorry. 

Since you think that all people who oppose this fiasco in Iraq are anti-war, I guess I just assumed that all religious tighty-righties did meth and enjoyed butt-sex. My bad.

So what were you doin at your pharmacist&#039;s? Getting some ingredients I presume. Or a new case of Viagra? Can&#039;t you hire those 6 students to work in your meth lab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I&#8217;m sorry. </p>
<p>Since you think that all people who oppose this fiasco in Iraq are anti-war, I guess I just assumed that all religious tighty-righties did meth and enjoyed butt-sex. My bad.</p>
<p>So what were you doin at your pharmacist&#8217;s? Getting some ingredients I presume. Or a new case of Viagra? Can&#8217;t you hire those 6 students to work in your meth lab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41577</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41577</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I misspelled Pulloutsy.  Perhaps I&#039;m just too excited over the new-found wealth to be gained by 2% of our nation&#039;s employees.

I visited my pharmacist today.  He hires 15 local college students, but is cutting 40% (6) of them as a result of the 40% increase in minimum wage.  The same thing will happen everywhere.  Thanks, Nan.

Thanks, also, for the pledge to restore integrity to your House.  Is it true that Mr. Pulloutsy owns $17 million in Starkist stock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I misspelled Pulloutsy.  Perhaps I&#8217;m just too excited over the new-found wealth to be gained by 2% of our nation&#8217;s employees.</p>
<p>I visited my pharmacist today.  He hires 15 local college students, but is cutting 40% (6) of them as a result of the 40% increase in minimum wage.  The same thing will happen everywhere.  Thanks, Nan.</p>
<p>Thanks, also, for the pledge to restore integrity to your House.  Is it true that Mr. Pulloutsy owns $17 million in Starkist stock?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41576</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41576</guid>
		<description>Check the following link (just the tip of the iceberg):

http://209.157.64.201/~beckwith/

I don&#039;t share your concerns about anything so silly as skin tone, and I hope he gets the Democrat nomination - this campaign could be lots of fun.  Will he get the support of Nancy Starkist Pollousy?

I don&#039;t know anything about crystal meth, including the physical form or the method of injestion.  Perhaps I should ask Barack Hussein Obama, since he seems to have experience in such areas.

P.S. - You&#039;re not doing well at imitating Independent Inky-doo.  Holding his hand seems to give you the warm fuzzies, but you might consider a return to your intelligent reasoning of long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the following link (just the tip of the iceberg):</p>
<p><a href="http://209.157.64.201/~beckwith/" rel="nofollow">http://209.157.64.201/~beckwith/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t share your concerns about anything so silly as skin tone, and I hope he gets the Democrat nomination &#8211; this campaign could be lots of fun.  Will he get the support of Nancy Starkist Pollousy?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about crystal meth, including the physical form or the method of injestion.  Perhaps I should ask Barack Hussein Obama, since he seems to have experience in such areas.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; You&#8217;re not doing well at imitating Independent Inky-doo.  Holding his hand seems to give you the warm fuzzies, but you might consider a return to your intelligent reasoning of long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41563</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41563</guid>
		<description>&quot;Today, our leaders in Washington seem incapable of working together in a practical, common-sense way. Politics has become so bitter and partisan and gummed up by money and influence that we can&#039;t tackle the big problems that demand solutions, and that&#039;s what we have to change.&quot;

Senator Obama - Announcing a possible run for president.

&quot;Pass the crystal meth, give me a big blast this time.&quot; - TeachVet upon hearing that a black man may actually become president in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Today, our leaders in Washington seem incapable of working together in a practical, common-sense way. Politics has become so bitter and partisan and gummed up by money and influence that we can&#8217;t tackle the big problems that demand solutions, and that&#8217;s what we have to change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Senator Obama &#8211; Announcing a possible run for president.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pass the crystal meth, give me a big blast this time.&#8221; &#8211; TeachVet upon hearing that a black man may actually become president in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41554</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41554</guid>
		<description>Trying to set a record for response efficiency - am I close?  You didn&#039;t post this past Christmas Eve, so I had nothing to which to respond.

One would think that &quot;independents&quot; would not be offended at criticism of Democrat leaders, but that&#039;s our Independent Inky-doo.

The majority of those who responded to the poll (to which you made reference) have not been to Iraq or Afghanistan.  If they aren&#039;t pencil-pushers, how do you suppose they spend their time?  Raking leaves around the Day Room?  You fell for the civilian-operated rag&#039;s ploy, ignoring their own disclaimer that the results were meaningless to make a false claim.

Neocons (Jewish conservatives) will invent a causus belli?  Since they are under constant threat, I don&#039;t think that will be necessary.

How many military bases?  I don&#039;t know.
Did the democratic Iraqi government that you seem to resent pass such a bill?  I don&#039;t know, but it might be advantageous in helping pay for their freedom.

Having never used the phrase &quot;Evil* traitors,&quot; I&#039;m not inclined to begin now; although I&#039;m not displeased that my comments sometimes cause you to look inward.  That would certainly impress the little office girls.

Would &quot;Madame Pulloutsy&quot; be more appropriate?  And, there you go, making me look up at a hero&#039;s car again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to set a record for response efficiency &#8211; am I close?  You didn&#8217;t post this past Christmas Eve, so I had nothing to which to respond.</p>
<p>One would think that &#8220;independents&#8221; would not be offended at criticism of Democrat leaders, but that&#8217;s our Independent Inky-doo.</p>
<p>The majority of those who responded to the poll (to which you made reference) have not been to Iraq or Afghanistan.  If they aren&#8217;t pencil-pushers, how do you suppose they spend their time?  Raking leaves around the Day Room?  You fell for the civilian-operated rag&#8217;s ploy, ignoring their own disclaimer that the results were meaningless to make a false claim.</p>
<p>Neocons (Jewish conservatives) will invent a causus belli?  Since they are under constant threat, I don&#8217;t think that will be necessary.</p>
<p>How many military bases?  I don&#8217;t know.<br />
Did the democratic Iraqi government that you seem to resent pass such a bill?  I don&#8217;t know, but it might be advantageous in helping pay for their freedom.</p>
<p>Having never used the phrase &#8220;Evil* traitors,&#8221; I&#8217;m not inclined to begin now; although I&#8217;m not displeased that my comments sometimes cause you to look inward.  That would certainly impress the little office girls.</p>
<p>Would &#8220;Madame Pulloutsy&#8221; be more appropriate?  And, there you go, making me look up at a hero&#8217;s car again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enkidu</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41550</link>
		<dc:creator>enkidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41550</guid>
		<description>Amazing how you bring such a fresh air of craziness to every post Macaca-san.  Bravo!  Hey btw can you point me to your Xmas eve rant n rave?  05&#039;s was a real knee slapper, head shaker, plea for help that I was kind of looking forward to seeing you top it in 06.  

So you feel that the 42% to 64% of service men and women who don&#039;t agree with your agenda are just &quot;pencil pushers&quot;?  Why don&#039;t you just out n out say that anyone who doesn&#039;t goosestep along with you, dumbya and cheney are just Evil* traitors?  You certainly imply this all the time, but I still think it is offensive and just downright stupid.  imho.  I never said the poll was 110% accurate or the last final holy word about what our troops think as of 12/06.  It is just a poll that indicated approx 42 to 64% of respondents think the Iraq war is a crock of Macaca.  

Hey btw thanks for the lesson on civility.  Referring to the new Speaker of the House as &quot;Madame Peelousely&quot; and Ted Kennedy as &quot;Orca&quot; really sets the tone for the new year!  Repeating wingnut nonsense about the troops shunning John Kerry reveals you to be factually challenged yet again.  

Personally I think their first 100 hours on the job went pretty well.  Jim Webb introduced a bill to extend GI Bill benefits to Iraq Debacle Veterans when they come home.  If they come home (ie not in a casket).  How many permanent military bases have we built in Iraq?  Didn&#039;t the Iraqi &#039;government&#039;  just pass a bill allowing majority foriegn ownership of their oil wealth?  Those pernicious facts again...

Rethugs only hope is to provoke Iran into some sort of causus belli (or the neocons will just manufacture an incident to get things rolling).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how you bring such a fresh air of craziness to every post Macaca-san.  Bravo!  Hey btw can you point me to your Xmas eve rant n rave?  05&#8242;s was a real knee slapper, head shaker, plea for help that I was kind of looking forward to seeing you top it in 06.  </p>
<p>So you feel that the 42% to 64% of service men and women who don&#8217;t agree with your agenda are just &#8220;pencil pushers&#8221;?  Why don&#8217;t you just out n out say that anyone who doesn&#8217;t goosestep along with you, dumbya and cheney are just Evil* traitors?  You certainly imply this all the time, but I still think it is offensive and just downright stupid.  imho.  I never said the poll was 110% accurate or the last final holy word about what our troops think as of 12/06.  It is just a poll that indicated approx 42 to 64% of respondents think the Iraq war is a crock of Macaca.  </p>
<p>Hey btw thanks for the lesson on civility.  Referring to the new Speaker of the House as &#8220;Madame Peelousely&#8221; and Ted Kennedy as &#8220;Orca&#8221; really sets the tone for the new year!  Repeating wingnut nonsense about the troops shunning John Kerry reveals you to be factually challenged yet again.  </p>
<p>Personally I think their first 100 hours on the job went pretty well.  Jim Webb introduced a bill to extend GI Bill benefits to Iraq Debacle Veterans when they come home.  If they come home (ie not in a casket).  How many permanent military bases have we built in Iraq?  Didn&#8217;t the Iraqi &#8216;government&#8217;  just pass a bill allowing majority foriegn ownership of their oil wealth?  Those pernicious facts again&#8230;</p>
<p>Rethugs only hope is to provoke Iran into some sort of causus belli (or the neocons will just manufacture an incident to get things rolling).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41201</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41201</guid>
		<description>Independent Inky-doo took the Gannett bait, buying the idea that the poll was representative of the US troops&#039; opinions.  My point was simple: the 16% of their subscribers who responded are not representative of troops in the field.

He also buys the notion that the civilian rag is &quot;obviously&quot; not a bunch of far left crazies and moonbats - simply because the word &lt;i&gt;Military&lt;/i&gt; is in the title.  Using a similar tactic, many communist groups in this country include the word &lt;i&gt;American&lt;/i&gt; in their title to suck in gullible people.

The pollster&#039;s disclaimer says it well enough: &lt;i&gt;The poll does not reflect opinions of the military as a whole.&lt;/i&gt;  &lt;b&gt;Given that, the poll is worthless&lt;/b&gt; - except for suckers.  They expect idiots who share their agenda to use the meaningless results, so I used their own statistics to illustrate the worthlessness of the poll.

Those polled were also asked whether &quot;Congress has my best interests at heart.&quot;  73% of the pencil-pushers disagreed.  You trust agenda-driven polls?  Slam dunk, baby!

Speaking of quite amusing, John Kerry is a war hero?  For what?  Violating rules of military conduct by killing a wounded enemy?  Killing a child in the arms of its grandmother?  A self-inflicted injury?  Torching villages?  Lying in Congressional testimony?  Kerry, your war hero, &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; a botched joke.  His Pinocchio face has gotten even longer since he &quot;misspoke.&quot;  The fool claims to have simply omitted a single word that would have clarified everything, but even with that word included, the statement still has the same negative implications toward military personnel.

Speaking of heroes, Orca Kennedy has now spoken.  Every time I hear his voice, I look at the photo that hangs on the wall above my computer desk - of his partially submerged Oldsmobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent Inky-doo took the Gannett bait, buying the idea that the poll was representative of the US troops&#8217; opinions.  My point was simple: the 16% of their subscribers who responded are not representative of troops in the field.</p>
<p>He also buys the notion that the civilian rag is &#8220;obviously&#8221; not a bunch of far left crazies and moonbats &#8211; simply because the word <i>Military</i> is in the title.  Using a similar tactic, many communist groups in this country include the word <i>American</i> in their title to suck in gullible people.</p>
<p>The pollster&#8217;s disclaimer says it well enough: <i>The poll does not reflect opinions of the military as a whole.</i>  <b>Given that, the poll is worthless</b> &#8211; except for suckers.  They expect idiots who share their agenda to use the meaningless results, so I used their own statistics to illustrate the worthlessness of the poll.</p>
<p>Those polled were also asked whether &#8220;Congress has my best interests at heart.&#8221;  73% of the pencil-pushers disagreed.  You trust agenda-driven polls?  Slam dunk, baby!</p>
<p>Speaking of quite amusing, John Kerry is a war hero?  For what?  Violating rules of military conduct by killing a wounded enemy?  Killing a child in the arms of its grandmother?  A self-inflicted injury?  Torching villages?  Lying in Congressional testimony?  Kerry, your war hero, <b>is</b> a botched joke.  His Pinocchio face has gotten even longer since he &#8220;misspoke.&#8221;  The fool claims to have simply omitted a single word that would have clarified everything, but even with that word included, the statement still has the same negative implications toward military personnel.</p>
<p>Speaking of heroes, Orca Kennedy has now spoken.  Every time I hear his voice, I look at the photo that hangs on the wall above my computer desk &#8211; of his partially submerged Oldsmobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41200</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41200</guid>
		<description>In the same post, you try to discount enkidu&#039;s poll, but then use the poll to try to bash a war hero like John Kerry. Remember he misspoke? You guys tried to spin it but it didn&#039;t work and you still lost the election.

I find it it quite amusing as well that in your &quot;analysis&quot; you state that a very high percentage of respondents have never been to Iraq or Afghanistan, and have a college degree. 

Hmm. I wonder if their education has something to do with the fact they haven&#039;t had to go over there. That kind of vindicates Kerry&#039;s botched joke, doesn&#039;t it?

Slam dunk baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the same post, you try to discount enkidu&#8217;s poll, but then use the poll to try to bash a war hero like John Kerry. Remember he misspoke? You guys tried to spin it but it didn&#8217;t work and you still lost the election.</p>
<p>I find it it quite amusing as well that in your &#8220;analysis&#8221; you state that a very high percentage of respondents have never been to Iraq or Afghanistan, and have a college degree. </p>
<p>Hmm. I wonder if their education has something to do with the fact they haven&#8217;t had to go over there. That kind of vindicates Kerry&#8217;s botched joke, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Slam dunk baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41199</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41199</guid>
		<description>Independent inky-doo, I missed your 100-minute timeline.  Sorry.

Ah, another poll by a civilian-run, liberal, agenda-driven Gannett publication!  Was the poll conducted through their USA Today office?  Let&#039;s analyze the mere 16% who responded to the poll.

The respondents were all subscribers to one of the Gannett rags, with only 9% in the Marine Corps.  &lt;i&gt;Representative of our fighting force in Iraq?&lt;/i&gt;
At least 50% have never deployed to Iraq.  &lt;i&gt;Representative?&lt;/i&gt;
85% have never deployed to Afghanistan.  &lt;i&gt;Representative?&lt;/i&gt;
61% live in off-base &lt;b&gt;civilian&lt;/b&gt; housing.  &lt;i&gt;Representative?&lt;/i&gt;

According to this poll, 73% have earned a college degree, and 35% have a Master&#039;sDegree or higher.  Is that &lt;i&gt;representative&lt;/i&gt; of our fighting forces (as defined by Sen. Kerry)?

&lt;b&gt;Disclaimer by the pollster&lt;/b&gt;:  &lt;i&gt;&quot;Those polled differ from the military as a whole in important ways.  They tend to be older, higher in rank, and more career-oriented.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  &lt;b&gt;Translation&lt;/b&gt;:  &lt;i&gt;They are simply state-side pencil-pushers.&lt;/i&gt;  Of the 32% who have deployed to Iraq only one time, it&#039;s doubtful that even a single one has seen combat duty there.  &lt;i&gt;Representative?&lt;/i&gt;  Were they the ones who flocked around Sen. Kerry in the Chow Hall?

Keep citing &quot;facts&quot; from the Gospel according to St. Poll.

You &quot;note&quot; that all left wing sites are blocked from U.S. military personnel?  As usual, that is a blatant lie.  Did you cite that &quot;fact&quot; from a poll, or what?  My USMC nephew - an actual combattant who is presently in Ramadi - says that all &quot;left wing sites&quot; (CNN, MSNBC, Kos, lies.com, etc.) are available, but yes, they choose Fox News, Drudge, Hannity, etc. 24/7/365.25.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent inky-doo, I missed your 100-minute timeline.  Sorry.</p>
<p>Ah, another poll by a civilian-run, liberal, agenda-driven Gannett publication!  Was the poll conducted through their USA Today office?  Let&#8217;s analyze the mere 16% who responded to the poll.</p>
<p>The respondents were all subscribers to one of the Gannett rags, with only 9% in the Marine Corps.  <i>Representative of our fighting force in Iraq?</i><br />
At least 50% have never deployed to Iraq.  <i>Representative?</i><br />
85% have never deployed to Afghanistan.  <i>Representative?</i><br />
61% live in off-base <b>civilian</b> housing.  <i>Representative?</i></p>
<p>According to this poll, 73% have earned a college degree, and 35% have a Master&#8217;sDegree or higher.  Is that <i>representative</i> of our fighting forces (as defined by Sen. Kerry)?</p>
<p><b>Disclaimer by the pollster</b>:  <i>&#8220;Those polled differ from the military as a whole in important ways.  They tend to be older, higher in rank, and more career-oriented.&#8221;</i>  <b>Translation</b>:  <i>They are simply state-side pencil-pushers.</i>  Of the 32% who have deployed to Iraq only one time, it&#8217;s doubtful that even a single one has seen combat duty there.  <i>Representative?</i>  Were they the ones who flocked around Sen. Kerry in the Chow Hall?</p>
<p>Keep citing &#8220;facts&#8221; from the Gospel according to St. Poll.</p>
<p>You &#8220;note&#8221; that all left wing sites are blocked from U.S. military personnel?  As usual, that is a blatant lie.  Did you cite that &#8220;fact&#8221; from a poll, or what?  My USMC nephew &#8211; an actual combattant who is presently in Ramadi &#8211; says that all &#8220;left wing sites&#8221; (CNN, MSNBC, Kos, lies.com, etc.) are available, but yes, they choose Fox News, Drudge, Hannity, etc. 24/7/365.25.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41191</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41191</guid>
		<description>Oh, while Bush was pleading for our patience, here&#039;s what was happening in Iraq...

Bush spoke on a day that was all too typical in that country. Two busloads of Shiite Muslims returning from their pilgrimage to Mecca were gunned down while passing through a predominantly Sunni Muslim swath of western Iraq. Twelve were killed and 18 wounded.

In Baghdad, bombings killed 11 and police patrols retrieved the bodies of 60 others dumped overnight. A suicide bomber killed four and injured 10 others in Tal Afar and three more Americans were killed, bringing the U.S. death toll to 3,017.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, while Bush was pleading for our patience, here&#8217;s what was happening in Iraq&#8230;</p>
<p>Bush spoke on a day that was all too typical in that country. Two busloads of Shiite Muslims returning from their pilgrimage to Mecca were gunned down while passing through a predominantly Sunni Muslim swath of western Iraq. Twelve were killed and 18 wounded.</p>
<p>In Baghdad, bombings killed 11 and police patrols retrieved the bodies of 60 others dumped overnight. A suicide bomber killed four and injured 10 others in Tal Afar and three more Americans were killed, bringing the U.S. death toll to 3,017.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41190</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41190</guid>
		<description>Well, Dumbya finally admitted that his Iraq policy is a failure...now the question is... will TeacherVet?

Though I don&#039;t agree with his proposed solution, at least he finally is admitting the mistakes he made. But yeah, I don&#039;t think sending 20, 000 more American targets is a really good idea, but we shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dumbya finally admitted that his Iraq policy is a failure&#8230;now the question is&#8230; will TeacherVet?</p>
<p>Though I don&#8217;t agree with his proposed solution, at least he finally is admitting the mistakes he made. But yeah, I don&#8217;t think sending 20, 000 more American targets is a really good idea, but we shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbc</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41172</link>
		<dc:creator>jbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41172</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m sorry about the lack of posting. I&#039;ve just been having a really hard time summoning the energy.

I&#039;ll see what I can do about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m sorry about the lack of posting. I&#8217;ve just been having a really hard time summoning the energy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll see what I can do about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enkidu</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41171</link>
		<dc:creator>enkidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41171</guid>
		<description>heh
I haven&#039;t visited lies.com lately, as jbc seems busy with the non-blogosphere tasks that preclude updates.  However it is good to know that after an absence of 3 weeks the resident troll is replying to my optimistic post with the usual vitriol in under 100 minutes.  Where&#039;s my stopwatch?  Ahhh there we go (starts timer).  How many minutes before your next screech, teach?

I read this today and thought to ask my dear friend and fellow citizen Macaca-san if he thinks 42% to 64% of US troops are traitors and all the rest of his usual spew. So what do you think?

&quot;Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the situation with Iraq?
35% Approve                                                     
&lt;b&gt;42% Disapprove                                                 
10% No opinion                                                 
12% Decline to answer&lt;/b&gt;  

From Military Times (obviously a bunch of far left crazies and moonbats) 12/29/06 

Note that all left wing sites are blocked for US military personnel.  It&#039;s nothing but FauxNEWZ 24/7/365.25.  That and Drudge.  Or Hannity. Fairly imbalanced news.  Wait until these folks hear the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh<br />
I haven&#8217;t visited lies.com lately, as jbc seems busy with the non-blogosphere tasks that preclude updates.  However it is good to know that after an absence of 3 weeks the resident troll is replying to my optimistic post with the usual vitriol in under 100 minutes.  Where&#8217;s my stopwatch?  Ahhh there we go (starts timer).  How many minutes before your next screech, teach?</p>
<p>I read this today and thought to ask my dear friend and fellow citizen Macaca-san if he thinks 42% to 64% of US troops are traitors and all the rest of his usual spew. So what do you think?</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the situation with Iraq?<br />
35% Approve<br />
<b>42% Disapprove<br />
10% No opinion<br />
12% Decline to answer</b>  </p>
<p>From Military Times (obviously a bunch of far left crazies and moonbats) 12/29/06 </p>
<p>Note that all left wing sites are blocked for US military personnel.  It&#8217;s nothing but FauxNEWZ 24/7/365.25.  That and Drudge.  Or Hannity. Fairly imbalanced news.  Wait until these folks hear the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TeacherVet</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41041</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41041</guid>
		<description>treehugger, I poked fun of no one aloud.  I typed it on my keyboard.

I own stock in Halliburton?  Wow.  Did I profit when they were given no-bid contracts in the aftermath of the 1990s wars?

Saddam, poor fellow, was so mistreated.  Tried, convicted, and hanged by his own people.  They obviously weren&#039;t aware that the U.S. midterm elections were a mandate for forgiveness of his little misdemeanors.  I wish him a Happy Martyr&#039;s Day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>treehugger, I poked fun of no one aloud.  I typed it on my keyboard.</p>
<p>I own stock in Halliburton?  Wow.  Did I profit when they were given no-bid contracts in the aftermath of the 1990s wars?</p>
<p>Saddam, poor fellow, was so mistreated.  Tried, convicted, and hanged by his own people.  They obviously weren&#8217;t aware that the U.S. midterm elections were a mandate for forgiveness of his little misdemeanors.  I wish him a Happy Martyr&#8217;s Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treehugger</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41028</link>
		<dc:creator>treehugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2006/11/11/bushs-lie-on-rumsfeld/#comment-41028</guid>
		<description>Can you believe that this admin is still bungling shit up over there?! For crying out loud, they can execute a man properly! The spectacle of him on the gallows will reinforce his claim to martyrdom and make him the hero in death that he was not in life. Wow.

I thought the American people spoke pretty loud and clear in November, demanding a major shift in this fiasco. Seems like the &quot;decider&quot; has decided to continue to waste more lives and money. Can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised, it’s what he does best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you believe that this admin is still bungling shit up over there?! For crying out loud, they can execute a man properly! The spectacle of him on the gallows will reinforce his claim to martyrdom and make him the hero in death that he was not in life. Wow.</p>
<p>I thought the American people spoke pretty loud and clear in November, demanding a major shift in this fiasco. Seems like the &#8220;decider&#8221; has decided to continue to waste more lives and money. Can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m surprised, it’s what he does best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
