Comments on: Trevor McDonald Interviews Bush http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/ believe nothing... Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:29:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: adam_blust http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14313 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:21:12 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14313 Well, now I've read the whole thing, and it was at least straightforward, if not tough. My favorite part was the obligatory "no WMD" question, where Bush started by blaming the media (shocker), and then brought up 9/11 again. If he had somehow weaved in how it was Clinton's fault, it woulda been a hat trick. Well, now I’ve read the whole thing, and it was at least straightforward, if not tough. My favorite part was the obligatory “no WMD” question, where Bush started by blaming the media (shocker), and then brought up 9/11 again. If he had somehow weaved in how it was Clinton’s fault, it woulda been a hat trick.

]]> by: jbc http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14311 Wed, 06 Jul 2005 05:38:13 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14311 Well, he's a knight and all that, so I guess he has to maintain a certain amount of chivalrous decorum. The full version was at least a little stronger than the excerpt, though I'll grant it was no Parliament-session grilling. Well, he’s a knight and all that, so I guess he has to maintain a certain amount of chivalrous decorum. The full version was at least a little stronger than the excerpt, though I’ll grant it was no Parliament-session grilling.

]]> by: adam_blust http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14309 Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:40:58 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2005/07/05/trevor-mcdonald-interviews-bush/#comment-14309 Sorry, but those are tough questions? I would characterize them as softballs that play right into the talking points. But that's just me. :-) Disclaimer: I haven't read the link, only what's excerpted here. Sorry, but those are tough questions? I would characterize them as softballs that play right into the talking points. But that’s just me. :-)

Disclaimer: I haven’t read the link, only what’s excerpted here.

]]>