<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael of Discourse.net on the Coming Kerry Landslide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/</link>
	<description>believe nothing...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Callender</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5490</link>
		<dc:creator>John Callender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 04:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5490</guid>
		<description>Well, that's the same thing as saying "neither," isn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s the same thing as saying &#8220;neither,&#8221; isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5488</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5488</guid>
		<description>"...either the data clearly show an oncoming Bush landslide, an oncoming Kerry landslide, or neither."

Not true.  There's no way to predict complex results based on information from samplings.  It's like the weather.   There's far too much chaos involved from the small, local areas to be able to predict with any accuracy what the overall effect will be.  So you CAN have the same data interpreted in two completely opposite directions at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;either the data clearly show an oncoming Bush landslide, an oncoming Kerry landslide, or neither.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not true.  There&#8217;s no way to predict complex results based on information from samplings.  It&#8217;s like the weather.   There&#8217;s far too much chaos involved from the small, local areas to be able to predict with any accuracy what the overall effect will be.  So you CAN have the same data interpreted in two completely opposite directions at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnoCan</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5479</link>
		<dc:creator>AnoCan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5479</guid>
		<description>But don't forget the Big Bush Wild Card: just happening to find Osama Bin Laden right before the election.

Think it won't happen? Think again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But don&#8217;t forget the Big Bush Wild Card: just happening to find Osama Bin Laden right before the election.</p>
<p>Think it won&#8217;t happen? Think again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5449</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5449</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Rick.  The worse things look for bushco. the greater the chance of something spectacular happening.  Terrorist attack (nudge-wink), terrorist caught (say no more), suspended elections, preemptive strike against Islamostan.  I really expect Bush to pop an o-ring and say something really stupid in one of the debates.  Something he won't be able to shake.  I heard him speak to a crowd last weekend and the dude is loosing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Rick.  The worse things look for bushco. the greater the chance of something spectacular happening.  Terrorist attack (nudge-wink), terrorist caught (say no more), suspended elections, preemptive strike against Islamostan.  I really expect Bush to pop an o-ring and say something really stupid in one of the debates.  Something he won&#8217;t be able to shake.  I heard him speak to a crowd last weekend and the dude is loosing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick pietz</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>rick pietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/08/02/michael-of-discoursenet-on-the-coming-kerry-landslide/#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>I think your analysis is probably right.  I don't think it will be the squeeker that the 2000 election was, and I think too many people are disenchanted w/ Bush.  On the other hand, I think your analysis only holds true barring the success of that much anticipated October surprise.  If one actually does occur, I think all bets are off, and the outcome will depend on the media coverage at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your analysis is probably right.  I don&#8217;t think it will be the squeeker that the 2000 election was, and I think too many people are disenchanted w/ Bush.  On the other hand, I think your analysis only holds true barring the success of that much anticipated October surprise.  If one actually does occur, I think all bets are off, and the outcome will depend on the media coverage at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
