Comments on: Ritter on the Inevitable US Defeat in Iraq (Again) http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/ believe nothing... Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:20:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: myself007 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-152517 myself007 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:02:19 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-152517 It is now July 2009. Bush has been dispatched to history's dust bin, where he can enjoy the company of his accomplices Blair and Howard. Obama has been appointed president by the American Zionist electoral system. The Iraqi National Resistance continues to steadily fuck US mercenaries. US economic collapse is eminent. It will take some time but is inevitable, unless WW3 is started by some stupid action like attacking Iran. It is now July 2009. Bush has been dispatched to history’s dust bin, where he can enjoy the company of his accomplices Blair and Howard. Obama has been appointed president by the American Zionist electoral system. The Iraqi National Resistance continues to steadily fuck US mercenaries. US economic collapse is eminent. It will take some time but is inevitable, unless WW3 is started by some stupid action like attacking Iran.

]]> By: myself007 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-126585 myself007 Thu, 25 Dec 2008 01:19:19 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-126585 Today is 25 December 2008. Very little changed since the unwarranted aggression on Iraq in 2003. The fragile 'coalition of the willing to be stupid" is almost disbanded, in view of the futility of continuing to face the Iraqi National Resistance. Bush suffered the ultimate humiliation dodging footwear missiles on camera, in what was supposed to be a cordial surrender of Iraq by the puppet Iraqi government headed by a traitor of the name "Malky". The US have three options for failure to choose from: * Remain at the present level of force and continue to haemorrhage. * Reduce force and risk annihilation by the robust Iraqi National Resistance. * Tuck tail between legs and run fast out of Iraq and Afghanistan. The last option is the more likely, in view of the terrible economic situation at home. Soldiers of fortune employed overseas are needed for the forthcoming Marshal Law. Revolution at home and subsequent secession of many states will lead the USA to the same fate the USSR suffered. Today is 25 December 2008. Very little changed since the unwarranted aggression on Iraq in 2003. The fragile ‘coalition of the willing to be stupid” is almost disbanded, in view of the futility of continuing to face the Iraqi National Resistance. Bush suffered the ultimate humiliation dodging footwear missiles on camera, in what was supposed to be a cordial surrender of Iraq by the puppet Iraqi government headed by a traitor of the name “Malky”.

The US have three options for failure to choose from:
* Remain at the present level of force and continue to haemorrhage.
* Reduce force and risk annihilation by the robust Iraqi National Resistance.
* Tuck tail between legs and run fast out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

The last option is the more likely, in view of the terrible economic situation at home. Soldiers of fortune employed overseas are needed for the forthcoming Marshal Law. Revolution at home and subsequent secession of many states will lead the USA to the same fate the USSR suffered.

]]> By: myself007 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68327 myself007 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:36:46 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68327 I will post my comments from an outside connection. The AFP agents monitoring my Internet connection can get stuffed. I will post my comments from an outside connection. The AFP agents monitoring my Internet connection can get stuffed.

]]> By: myself007 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68326 myself007 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:34:44 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68326 It is now September 2007. Ritter's comment is still more valid than ever. US mercenaries have been comprehensively defeated by the brave patriots of the Iraqi National Resistance. What remains now is to see Bush and Cheney behind bars, for their role in the controlled demolition of WTC in 2001, and their war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is now September 2007. Ritter’s comment is still more valid than ever. US mercenaries have been comprehensively defeated by the brave patriots of the Iraqi National Resistance.

What remains now is to see Bush and Cheney behind bars, for their role in the controlled demolition of WTC in 2001, and their war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.

]]> By: myself007 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68325 myself007 Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:23:08 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-68325 It is now September 2007. Ritter's analysis is proven more valid than ever. US mercenaries are now comprehensively defeated. The way out is far more difficult for them than the "mission accomplished" joke suggested. Again the free world is indebted to those Iraqi braves fighting for their country and wiping off the occupation scourge. Justice may eventually be achieved by putting the Bush-Cheney gang behind bars. It is now September 2007. Ritter’s analysis is proven more valid than ever. US mercenaries are now comprehensively defeated. The way out is far more difficult for them than the “mission accomplished” joke suggested.

Again the free world is indebted to those Iraqi braves fighting for their country and wiping off the occupation scourge.

Justice may eventually be achieved by putting the Bush-Cheney gang behind bars.

]]> By: myself http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-11639 myself Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:47:53 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-11639 Well, well ... So Ritter's comments proved to be valid, after all. His comments stood the test of time, so does the following comment: FAILURE IS THE ONLY OPTION By: Mohammed A. Hegazi Joseph Biden, a US Zionist senator, said about the US venture in Iraq, "Failure is not an option". Any smart analyst would point out to those deluded US politicians: Failure is the only option left for them. The only other option would be to wipe out the Iraqi people in an unprecedented act of genocide by carpet bombing all Iraqi cities. So, a wise political decision by US Zionists would be: Pack up, cut your losses and leave. Sifting through the rubbish dished out by US Zionist spin media, we may come out with sound conclusions. The US is getting a good hiding at the hands of the brave fighters of the Iraqi resistance. US propagandists can call them insurgents, Sunni triangulars, thugs, or Saddam loyalists. They do call them anything but nationalist zealots who are determined to free their country from vile foreign occupation by greedy and ruthless invaders. The US is doomed to failure as a result of a brilliant plan by the Iraqi army. It is so simple to comprehend: It would have been stupid to engage the US/UK invaders in a classical war where the aggressors had air superiority. The brilliant tactic adopted by the Iraqi generals was to bring the invaders down to the ground. So, Iraqi tacticians decided to avoid the total destruction of their cities by handing them over, in what the clumsy Yanks and Brits thought was a quick victory. One year later, the invaders discovered that they were bleeding to death. It was indeed a brilliant Iraqi tactic. Those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis fighting on the ground today are mainly soldiers of the Iraqi regular army out of uniform, not remnants of "Saddam Loyalists", as the spin media wants us to believe. They are making the most out of their modest arms and superior training, against a 'privatised' US force composed of private 'security contractors' and a ragtag regular force of soldiers of fortune, mainly 'niggers' and 'spics' ( Blacks and Latinos forced by economic necessity). Those US soldiers are people who have no genuine cause for which to fight and die. In the heat of battle, they would hide behind one another. On the other hand, Iraqi fighters do have a cause. They are fighting to free their country from foreign aggression. History attests that if a people are so intent on liberating their country, they will. Now, White House thugs can say goodbye to their grand Zionist project. They will never be able to control the world, or even the Middle East. Their war of terror failed dismally. The world owes it to those brave Iraqis fighting for their freedom. Their moment of final victory is approaching. Well, well …
So Ritter’s comments proved to be valid, after all. His comments stood the test of time, so does the following comment:

FAILURE IS THE ONLY OPTION

By: Mohammed A. Hegazi

Joseph Biden, a US Zionist senator, said about the US venture in Iraq, “Failure is not an option”. Any smart analyst would point out to those deluded US politicians: Failure is the only option left for them. The only other option would be to wipe out the Iraqi people in an unprecedented act of genocide by carpet bombing all Iraqi cities. So, a wise political decision by US Zionists would be: Pack up, cut your losses and leave.

Sifting through the rubbish dished out by US Zionist spin media, we may come out with sound conclusions. The US is getting a good hiding at the hands of the brave fighters of the Iraqi resistance. US propagandists can call them insurgents, Sunni triangulars, thugs, or Saddam loyalists. They do call them anything but nationalist zealots who are determined to free their country from vile foreign occupation by greedy and ruthless invaders.

The US is doomed to failure as a result of a brilliant plan by the Iraqi army. It is so simple to comprehend: It would have been stupid to engage the US/UK invaders in a classical war where the aggressors had air superiority. The brilliant tactic adopted by the Iraqi generals was to bring the invaders down to the ground. So, Iraqi tacticians decided to avoid the total destruction of their cities by handing them over, in what the clumsy Yanks and Brits thought was a quick victory.

One year later, the invaders discovered that they were bleeding to death. It was indeed a brilliant Iraqi tactic. Those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis fighting on the ground today are mainly soldiers of the Iraqi regular army out of uniform, not remnants of “Saddam Loyalists”, as the spin media wants us to believe. They are making the most out of their modest arms and superior training, against a ‘privatised’ US force composed of private ’security contractors’ and a ragtag regular force of soldiers of fortune, mainly ‘niggers’ and ’spics’ ( Blacks and Latinos forced by economic necessity). Those US soldiers are people who have no genuine cause for which to fight and die. In the heat of battle, they would hide behind one another. On the other hand, Iraqi fighters do have a cause. They are fighting to free their country from foreign aggression. History attests that if a people are so intent on liberating their country, they will.

Now, White House thugs can say goodbye to their grand Zionist project. They will never be able to control the world, or even the Middle East. Their war of terror failed dismally. The world owes it to those brave Iraqis fighting for their freedom. Their moment of final victory is approaching.

]]> By: Tom Buckner http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5384 Tom Buckner Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:38:20 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5384 This war could be WORSE than Vietnam, perhaps, even if we lose less people in Iraq, for one simple reason: when we finally left Vietnam, the victors were content to leave well enough alone. They forgave us, eventually. We didn't spend the rest of the Seventies worrying about domestic terror attacks by Vietnamese suicide bombers, and so forth. Getting out might not be enough this time. Bush's campaign song might as well be a David Bowie tune from 1982: Cat People (Putting Out Fires With Gasoline). This war could be WORSE than Vietnam, perhaps, even if we lose less people in Iraq, for one simple reason: when we finally left Vietnam, the victors were content to leave well enough alone. They forgave us, eventually. We didn’t spend the rest of the Seventies worrying about domestic terror attacks by Vietnamese suicide bombers, and so forth. Getting out might not be enough this time. Bush’s campaign song might as well be a David Bowie tune from 1982: Cat People (Putting Out Fires With Gasoline).

]]> By: Doc Clarke http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5377 Doc Clarke Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:30:48 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5377 The American colonials had a militia organized along similar lines as the European regular infantry, while the Vietnamese relied on the NVA, not just VC insurgents. Descriptions from Falujah and of the Al-Sadr militia paint an image of untrained rag-tag groups attacking targets of opportunity and showing only limited cooperation or coordination with each other. The American colonials had a militia organized along similar lines as the European regular infantry, while the Vietnamese relied on the NVA, not just VC insurgents. Descriptions from Falujah and of the Al-Sadr militia paint an image of untrained rag-tag groups attacking targets of opportunity and showing only limited cooperation or coordination with each other.

]]> By: a_stupid_box http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5376 a_stupid_box Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:57:15 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5376 "To Ritter, the US is facing a well organized insurgency led by highly trained Baathist operatives and agents of Saddam, yet witnesses on the ground describe a disorganized militia acting on opportunity and relying on popular support for their survival. Are witnesses missing something, or is Ritter trying to save American face by exagerating the nature of the opposition?" Gee, you mean something like the colonial forces when the U.S. was fighting for independence against the British? Or maybe the Vietnamese forces in that "skirmish" in the 60's? Of course, the large, well-organized armies won those, so maybe they're bad examples... wait a minute... Never underestimate a determined fighting force -- particularly a decentralized one that will fight until the last man standing. As long as the forces have popular support, their ranks will remain full enough to pose a threat. Ritter realizes this, just as I have since the outset of the war. “To Ritter, the US is facing a well organized insurgency led by highly trained Baathist operatives and agents of Saddam, yet witnesses on the ground describe a disorganized militia acting on opportunity and relying on popular support for their survival. Are witnesses missing something, or is Ritter trying to save American face by exagerating the nature of the opposition?”

Gee, you mean something like the colonial forces when the U.S. was fighting for independence against the British? Or maybe the Vietnamese forces in that “skirmish” in the 60’s? Of course, the large, well-organized armies won those, so maybe they’re bad examples… wait a minute…

Never underestimate a determined fighting force — particularly a decentralized one that will fight until the last man standing. As long as the forces have popular support, their ranks will remain full enough to pose a threat. Ritter realizes this, just as I have since the outset of the war.

]]> By: Doc Clarke http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5375 Doc Clarke Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:58:03 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5375 To Ritter, the US is facing a well organized insurgency led by highly trained Baathist operatives and agents of Saddam, yet witnesses on the ground describe a disorganized militia acting on opportunity and relying on popular support for their survival. Are witnesses missing something, or is Ritter trying to save American face by exagerating the nature of the opposition? To Ritter, the US is facing a well organized insurgency led by highly trained Baathist operatives and agents of Saddam, yet witnesses on the ground describe a disorganized militia acting on opportunity and relying on popular support for their survival. Are witnesses missing something, or is Ritter trying to save American face by exagerating the nature of the opposition?

]]> By: a_stupid_box http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5367 a_stupid_box Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:34:17 +0000 http://www.lies.com/wp/2004/07/27/ritter-on-the-inevitable-us-defeat-in-iraq-again/#comment-5367 Gee, it's a shame I hadn't been saying the same thing since the war began... Oh wait, yes, I did. On this very site in fact. Gee, it’s a shame I hadn’t been saying the same thing since the war began…

Oh wait, yes, I did. On this very site in fact.

]]>