<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Super Seekrit 9/11 Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/</link>
	<description>believe nothing...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 17:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>more seekrits! 

did you see the connections being made between halliburton and the axis of evil? this was posted on yahoo! today ... any other postings that you guys know of (something more substantive ... maybe more figures and citations?).



&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/afp/20030506/pl_afp/iraq_us_company_oil_halliburton&#038;cid=1521&#038;ncid=1480"&gt;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/afp/20030506/pl_afp/iraq_us_company_oil_halliburton&#038;cid=1521&#038;ncid=1480&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more seekrits! </p>
<p>did you see the connections being made between halliburton and the axis of evil? this was posted on yahoo! today &#8230; any other postings that you guys know of (something more substantive &#8230; maybe more figures and citations?).</p>
<p><a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/afp/20030506/pl_afp/iraq_us_company_oil_halliburton&#038;cid=1521&#038;ncid=1480">http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/afp/20030506/pl_afp/iraq_us_company_oil_halliburton&#038;cid=1521&#038;ncid=1480</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2003 21:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lies.com/wp/2003/05/03/the-super-seekrit-911-report/#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>Most of this report is a rehash of information that already got a good deal of publicity in all forms of media for months after 9/11. There were numerous allegations and discussions about how much the White House, aides to the White House, and various Federal agencies knew about various pieces of the puzzle and warnings of some form of terorist attacks. Hence, all the concern about various agencies not sharing or considering vital information to help put a more specific threat in focus. It was these cracks in the system that seems to have played the largest part in the Country's failure to defend itself against those horrific attacks.



So a presiding Administration doesn't want another wave of negative press over an earlier well-documented issue to rear its head again. Shocking.



As the article points out, there is no "gotcha" type of information to point directly at Bush's Administration (as people seem to be straining themselves to do). I'd be more concerned that in all that time since 9/11 our intelligence and informational channeling process to more effectively recognise specific threats by terrorists does not seem to be much improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of this report is a rehash of information that already got a good deal of publicity in all forms of media for months after 9/11. There were numerous allegations and discussions about how much the White House, aides to the White House, and various Federal agencies knew about various pieces of the puzzle and warnings of some form of terorist attacks. Hence, all the concern about various agencies not sharing or considering vital information to help put a more specific threat in focus. It was these cracks in the system that seems to have played the largest part in the Country&#8217;s failure to defend itself against those horrific attacks.</p>
<p>So a presiding Administration doesn&#8217;t want another wave of negative press over an earlier well-documented issue to rear its head again. Shocking.</p>
<p>As the article points out, there is no &#8220;gotcha&#8221; type of information to point directly at Bush&#8217;s Administration (as people seem to be straining themselves to do). I&#8217;d be more concerned that in all that time since 9/11 our intelligence and informational channeling process to more effectively recognise specific threats by terrorists does not seem to be much improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
